We have written extensively about the new Moto Guzzi California 1400 Custom and Touring models, including a tech piece, as well as our report from the European press introduction a few months ago. Those two articles contain all of the technical details, and I will only touch on a few of those below.
This is the first all-new, ground-up, redesign of a Moto Guzzi model since the purchase of Moto Guzzi by Piaggio several years ago. In short, Piaggio views Moto Guzzi as the top European brand, and it seems prepared to spend the money necessary to develop motorcycles worthy of that position.
I had to ride the new California 1400 models for myself, and Moto Guzzi extended an invitation to MD to test both bikes near Malibu, California last week. The massive machines in both Custom and Touring iterations were lined up behind a Santa Monica hotel, and I boarded one of the naked, black Custom models for my first impression. After being schooled by a Moto Guzzi representative on use of the three different engine maps (essentially Sport, Touring and Rain), the adjustable traction control and the cruise control incorporated into the ride-by-wire throttle, we worked our way at slow speed through heavy city traffic before reaching the Coast Highway.
Having selected the Sport mode (designated “Veloce”), my first chance to twist the throttle hard led to a big surprise. These bikes look like big, heavy cruisers, but this is no cruiser engine. This engine revs quickly, almost like a sportbike, befitting its very over-square bore/stroke ratio and four-valve head design.
As a footnote here, the 1380cc 90 degree v-twin motor has a bore of 104mm and a relatively short stroke of 81.2mm. The horsepower kings in the “heavyweight cruiser” category are arguably offered by Star and Victory. Both of those engines are long-stroke designs with the Star displacing 1844cc and having a bore of 100mm and a stroke of 118mm. The 1731cc Victory engine is 101mm x 108mm. The four-valve heads on the new 1380 cc Guzzi also have significantly higher compression at 10.5-to-1 (versus 9.5-to-1 on the Star and 9.4-to-1 on the Victory).
So this is not a “cruiser” engine in the traditional sense. It is primarily air-cooled, so the compression ratio is still significantly below that of modern sportbikes, however. The motor has a fairly light flywheel effect, further distinguishing it from the typical, slow-revving, heavyweight cruiser twin. The primary balance of the engine with its full 90 degree configuration also adds to its free-revving nature. So the first time I opened the throttle in anger, I reacted with a “WOW” inside my helmet.
In Veloce mode, the throttle response is so crisp I at first thought the fuel injection tuning was off, and that the bike was surging abruptly when I opened the throttle. I think this was part of my pre-ride expectation that this would be a typical, large-displacement cruiser with a slow revving motor, however. After more experimentation, I think the motor is just super responsive for this style of motorcycle. The fuel injection felt very well dialed in.
The “Touring” mode also offers full power, but a slightly softer delivery. By this I mean that it takes a larger twist of the throttle to achieve the same engine response. After we got into a twisty section of canyon road, and came to a stop for photography, a number of the journalists told me they preferred the Touring mode for the tight twists and turns, so I gave that a try. Switching to Touring mode, I found that the bike was still plenty fast, but it was easier to smoothly transition the bike in and out of corners. It allowed you to relax a little, but still go fast.
Which brings us to the subject of handling. Both the Custom and the Touring models offer the three-mode ignition maps, as well as selectable stages of traction control. This 90 degree v-twin is not a full blown 1200cc superbike engine you might find in a Ducati, for instance, which almost requires a traction control system, it is a 1380cc engine with tuning somewhere between that of a sportbike and that of a traditional cruiser. Given the power and torque put out by this engine at low rpm levels, and the relatively light flywheel effect, you can spin up the rear tire exiting corners without much difficulty.
Traction control can be turned completely off, but I put it in setting “1”, which allows the rear tire to spin slightly before the system catches it. With this setting, I did not experience any problems during our ride, and if it intervened at any point I was unaware of it. This is nevertheless a nice feature to have, particularly during foul weather or on cold mornings with cold tires. Settings 2, and 3 intervene more quickly, so that you can essentially dial out any wheel spin whatsoever.
With some of the usual Moto Guzzi shaking at idle, the engine really smooths out as soon as you get underway. In addition to the inherent smoothness of a v-twin with a 90 degree angle, the engine is mounted in a unique way to isolate vibration from the frame without affecting chassis stiffness or handling. This was discussed in greater detail in our tech article.
I was aboard the Touring model when journalist Basem Wasef and I decided to sprint ahead of the rest of our group and hang with the Moto Guzzi representative who had decided to really push the pace. Basem and the MG guy were on the naked Customs, which come with slighly longer travel rear suspension (10mm). The bikes handled very well . . . limited only by their ground clearance. Despite the massive wheelbase and huge tires (including a 200 section, 16″ inch rear and a 130 section 18″ front), both the Touring and the Custom models change direction easily. Overall handling was surprisingly good, given the size and weight of the bikes (claimed weight ranges from 661 pounds for the Custom to 709 for the Touring).
Both bikes have comfortable ergonomics. In fact, these are the first Moto Guzzi’s I have ridden in a while that seem to have plenty of leg room . . . placing the foot pegs/floorboards in the proper position. The seats are different on each model, but both offered firm support that was comfortable during the relatively short time I was aboard each bike.
Moto Guzzi has given these bikes six-speed transmissions despite their huge torque and broad powerbands. These bikes shift as well as any large-displacement v-twin I have ridden, which is a testament to the development efforts since Piaggio acquired the brand.
Both the Touring and Custom models share the same engine, which Moto Guzzi rates at 96 hp at 6,500 rpm and 88.5 foot/pounds of torque at 2,750 rpm.
The braking system (which is not linked) includes dual 320mm front discs controlled by quality Brembo radial-mount four-piston calipers. The rear brake is a 280mm disc and Brembo two-piston caliper. The brakes were outstanding during our brief test, offering huge power with very good feel. Just what you need when hauling down a quick 700 pound machine.
This Moto Guzzi California has come an awful long way from the decades-old v-7 Police model fancied by the Los Angeles police department. While that bike had Moto Guzzi soul, and performed well enough to win over one of the largest police forces in the country, this new Moto Guzzi California 1400 represents a huge step forward.
One of the journalists at the press introduction last week asked the designer of these beautiful bikes (Miguel Galluzzi) whether Moto Guzzi was targeting any particular competing manufacturer, such as Harley-Davidson, when it developed these new machines. Galluzzi didn’t hesitate when he responded. He stated that “No”. “Moto Guzzi is unique, and it does not compete with Harley-Davidson”, although he would “welcome Harley-Davidson riders to the Moto Guzzi experience.” This fit perfectly with my own impressions of these new California 1400s. They are not traditional cruisers. They ride in a spirited manner similar to much lighter bikes, as a result of a quick revving, powerful engine and solid, refined handling. Are they “muscle bikes”? Are they “brawny standards”? Apparently, Galluzzi thinks they are none of the above. They are simply a new type of Moto Guzzi.
The Moto Guzzi California Touring 1400 ABS will be available soon at United States dealers at an MSRP of $17,990. The California 1400 Custom ABS will also be available soon at a price of $14,990. The more expensive Touring model nets you the integrated saddlebags, windshield, fog lights, touring saddle and passenger grab rail. An extensive list of accessories will be available for both bikes, and you can essentially turn a Custom into a Touring after purchase. For additional details and specifications, visit the Moto Guzzi web site.
the new 2014 moto guzzi 1400 california custom is the best looking cruiser ever designed by any manufacturer in the one hundred and twenty year history of motorcycles . at a pice of $14,700 (msrp) moto guzzis will sell like hotcakes . i want one and i will buy one soon . this bike is far ahead in style and performance of any cruiser from harley yamaha honda and indian . the black 2014 mg 1400 cal custom is a complete success in every way .
doggrell3000
new york ny
I want some of what he’s smokin’
I like Guzzis and like this cruiser version, though I wouldn’t buy a cruiser of any kind. It’s too bad M-G dropped the the Breva 1100. Lovely bike.
The Breva 750 was prettier, IMO. The larger silhouette of the 1100 made the proportions look off to my eye.
PN, for some reason 1100 Brevas did not sell well in the USA. Like you, I think they are a good looking/performing bike. But apparently we are a minority. I have a `04 750 Breva so didn’t need the 1100 version when it got here.
The Breva is still around – just with a new name, engine upgrade, and minor styling changes in the form of a Sport 1200 8V.
I’m not a big cruiser fan but the stripped version has some style and menace to it. Black ain’t a colour though, just an absence of light.
This excellent report mentions the business of bore / stroke ratios which is a technical spec that is so important to an engine’s character. MotoGuzzi have created an engine that will have power everywhere – the capacity and 10.5:1 compression will supply good torque, the 4 valve heads and well over square B/S ratio will give it power in the upper rev range.
With its low centre of gravity, good suspension and brakes this model should perform well. Thankfully this design has not incorporated the dreaded forward controls of other cruisers.
Guzzi Cruisers are not Cruisers. They are sport cruisers offering comfort and sporting ability. Best of both worlds.
Bill
Gas has been living happily over cylinders for a long time and the cylinders are not mostly out in the breeze like the Touring/Custom Guzzi. This-is-not-a-problem.
That last image, bike foreground, water background, is killer! I’ll prepay for a poster right now.
I don’t know what I’d pick between this and the F6B Dirck just reviewed.
Dirck, I sure hope they don’t pay you for this duty! (Kidding, you’re doing a great job…)
Dirck – Did you have any reason to suspect that the hot cylinders were causing (or could cause) gasoline in the tank to boil?
No.
🙂 🙂 🙂 I haven’t had a laugh like that in a long time, thanks!
piaggio may have lined the underside of the tank with insulation. if not, i would be inclined to remove the tank and add it forth-with. never know when you’re going to get stuck traffic (in the rest of the non-lane splitting world) on a 98 degree day. ever seen metalized glass cloth…? it’s that gold foil you see lining the firewalls and engine bays on rolex cars and daytona prototypes. used to minimize heat transfer into the driver’s space. good for 400+ degrees. line the underside with some of that and you’re home free.
Yes but…
Moto Guzzi may have well insulated the underside of the tank just so, but I don’t think this to be much of a concern. My Norge is fared in such a way that most of the cylinder’s heat will go straight upward too when there’s little air movement. Come to think of it there are many designs where there is substantial heat right there under the tank. We’re talking about a fair amount of volume of fuel unlike a fuel line running over the top of an engine. I just can’t see it being an issue even if the tank looks to closely wrap around each barrel.
Like a woman, a bike has to be appealing to the eye before you try to get acquainted. The Custom could be one of those bikes. It sounds like a Sport/Cruiser to coin a category. Fun to ride at a brisk pace, even in the corners. Now, if it was not so chubby.
I rode the California 1400 Custom this past weekend in Malibu. I am a sport rider, and “hard core” Griso rider’ so I was especially interested in how they would compare. I gotta say “the only thing cruiser about this bike are the floor boards”. It was an absolute dream to ride. Whether you want to run down the highway, or carve up a canyon, it does it all well. The traction control works great on launch conditions. I had the opportunity to try out the ABS too. It all worked well, as expected. I like the plastic teflon blocks mounted under the boards. When it makes contact with the asphalt, it doesn’t scrape and dig like your traditional boards. You don’t even start to feel it until the board starts to fold up. I give this bike very high marks. I was able to run through the canyons with the Griso with no problems. I plan to purchase one myself in the not too distant future.
I’d rather have this 1400 Custom than a Diavel, but only because the Diavel is made by Ducati. My son has a Duc and thats pretty much convinced me I don’t want anything built by that company.
That one, big, round gauge is reminiscent of the 1000cc Vincent — wonder if that’s just coincidental?
Not especially regarding these interesting, big Guzzis, but what a beautiful read. Nice format for a review, well-written, mature riding perceptions, interspersed with great looking, large photos. I don’t think anybody touches these MD reviews. Now, back to the bikes…
Thanks, Ken.
Q: “Are they “muscle bikes”? Are they “brawny standards”? Apparently, Galluzzi thinks they are none of the above.”
A: he’s just being coy. they are guzzi’s take on the muscle bike (ie. performance cruiser). way too much “bad-ittude” going on in the styling for it not to be. LOL 🙂 competing in the same category as the v-rod, the v-max, t-bird and R3, the m109, diavel, etc.
It sure looks nice without the annoying license plate.
Did you get a feel for fuel efficiency on your ride? How about heat off the engine?
I know these air cooled 1400s are down on power compared to the traditional large “sport tourers”, but weight interestingly seems similar. How would you compare “agility” of the new Cali 1400s against bikes like the Concours 14 (670 lb w/o saddlebags), K1600GT (703 lb), ST1300 (730 lb) which have similar weight and longer wheelbases? With the raised rear on the Custom model, how far off is cornering clearance to something like the ST1300 or K16GT, which also have low-ish pegs for comfort? I’m guessing not that much.
Based on what I read, these seem like a really nice hybrid of the sporty engine character (if not outright power) and handling/brakes of a sport tour bike with the traditional look and sound of a cruiser/standard. Nice job MG.
The Griso is my idea of a cruiser, but if someone put a gun to my head and told me to buy a bike with floorboards, this would be it.
wait, i see water…? is that a dock…? careful of those jugs stickin’ out. you might catch one on a bollard and go OVERBOARD like that journo on the FJR. nobody wants to be THAT guy.
While I can’t see myself ever owning a cruiser, this would certainly be the one if I ever decided to take that plunge. As cruisers go, damn but that’s a cool-looking bike. It sounds like it’s even halfway fun to ride.
Those exhaust pipes sure look awfully restrictive, though. I’m talking original Bandit 1200 restrictive. Those might have to go.
re: “Those might have to go.”
no might about it. it’s a guzzi 90. not tossing them would be a crime against motorcycling.
My SV1000 N sounded like an industrial mixer with the stock pipes. Like every bike I’ve had, it got new pipes. I need to hear the motor – its a big part of enjoying the experience.
I’m with Norm…it would be more that a shame – a “crime” seems like the right term to keep the stock pipes
Yes, those exit holes are dinky compared to the outide diameter of the exhaust system. Can any of you tech guys out there explain if this really matters?
In terms of power output and sound, it definitely matters. That is one seriously choked-off exhaust system.
Not sure how much “choking” is actually being done with these but like most any bike today it must incorporate a catalyzer and meet sound regs. No doubt a new set of chromed beauties would let everyone hear the Guzzi music though.
I agree with you. I am not a cruiser guy either. However, If I buy one, this is it!